Results From Using “Soft” Evolutionary Theory

There has been a long history of falsified predictions in evolution which end up to be a dead end then junked. Sometimes these junked ideas in evolution make a comeback while new ideas using “soft” evolutionary thinking are invented! Non-coding DNA is a classic example, “The noncoding region is often surprisingly large; in humans, some 98 percent of the genome merits ‘junk’ status which has lead to neglect in research. However, as functions are found, research begins to expand more in this area! Scientists continue to be surprised by uncovering this so-called, “junk” region as playing a vital role that can turn information into useful products.

However, it’s not the only area of research!

“Despite the fact that almost every cell found in vertebrates has at least one primary cilium, the organ was regarded as merely an evolutionary relic – the cellular equivalent to the human appendix. Of late, however, it has become increasingly clear that primary cilia serve as powerful communication hubs. (After all, they do sort of look like antennae.) Disruptions in the activity of cilia are now understood to lead to a whole class of diseases dubbed ciliopathies, and researchers are hustling to figure out what makes them tick.”

A parasitic marine/aquatic animal with a toothed, funnel-like sucking mouth that lives on other living fish has a “stress hormone.” This discovery was touted for relevance sake and the animal being a lower species which is supposedly leading them to new understanding on how stress hormones supposedly evolved.

“Most jawless animals similar to the lamprey didn’t survive into the modern era, so they’re not available for us to use as we strive to learn more about how human systems developed,” the lead researcher said.  “The sea lamprey, a survivor, gives us a snapshot of what happened as vertebrates evolved into the animals we know today.”

When observations are not able to be accomplished, soft theory is being deployed! Finding a stress hormone is not evidence for Darwinian evolution and most likely will only create more complexity within the ‘theory.’ In 2007, induced pluripotent stem cells was accomplished in a lab. Three years later a story has been invented and promoted for these cells in their supposed role in bringing light new information about evolution’s history.

“Even though received wisdom is that it evolved with mammals, our research suggests that it was there all along, just not in many of the species that people use in the lab.  In fact, pluripotent cells probably exist in the embryos of the simple animals from which amphibians evolved.”

Yep, they received a new revelation and it was there all along! lol Hang on, got to get back in my chair from laughing so hard…lol…Not only that, but lack of evolution makes total sense as well for this story…“since mammals evolved directly from reptiles it makes sense that the genetic mechanisms controlling embryo development remain largely unchanged from axolotls to humans.” A total faith explanation based on assumptions, many of which have been falsified while other assumptions are buried so far into the past which allows it to remain as hope for certain scientists concerning Darwinian evolution! So which do you think gets better results for Darwinian evolution or evolution in general, predictions of the future or assumptions concerning the past?

It’s not only present soft explanations but comebacks in old theories. “Recapitulation theory” of Ernst Haeckel shows itself once again! Hang on, getting back into the chair again…lol  It gets media attention every now and then. This ‘theory’ was discarded long ago by the likes of Stephen Jay Gould. This particular old ‘theory’ consists of the development of an embryo which is able to replay its evolutionary history. He made a drawing in order to support his new invention which was later deemed to be a fake! In the realm of Darwinian evolution there is a  different explanation. It’s only the mutations that are preserved in an organism. But this doesn’t stop it from resurfacing in research today! Most likely why this non-Darwinian theory still gets press while other ‘theories’ that are even based on evolution do not because they think it wouldn’t remind anyone from the public of creationism or intelligent design…

“A new study shows the human brain regions that expand the most during infancy and childhood are the same parts that expanded the most during evolution as humans diverged from other primates. ” -Live Science

The results of “soft” evolutionary theory is bad science resulting in no new information which creates a lot of confusion with it’s expanded and revised stories.  How a species actually works with all it’s complexity is good science and is what scientists should be focusing on more.

Your Proton Pump Working Inside Your Inner Power Plant

A research team from the Freiburg Institute for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology uncovered the best look at one of the body’s largest enzymes known as Mitochondrial Complex I…It contains four major parts with a function to transmit the energy in the food we eat into mechanical energy by using a proton pump inside our inner power plant.

Interesting news has come out of this research…

“In a laboratory experiment, hydrogen and oxygen gas would react in an explosion and the energy contained would be released as heat.  In biological oxidation, the energy will be released by the membrane bound protein complexes of the respiratory chain in a controlled manner in small packages.

“Comparable to a fuel cell, this process generates an electrical membrane potential, which is the driving force of ATP synthesis.  The total surface of all mitochondrial membranes in a human body covers about 14.000 square meter.  This accounts for a daily production of about 65 kg of ATP.”

The energy produced across that 14 square meters of mitochondrial membrane enables the  ATP synthesis to work which keeps all of us and every living thing from bacteria to giraffes – alive! Studying these mechanical devices which there are trillions of in the body that look something like coupling rods has added years to previous research in trying to understand how Mitochondrial Complex I works! Look how science daily compares it to a railway vehicle that provides power to a train…

“The now presented structural model provides important and unexpected insights for the function of complex I.  A special type of “transmission element,” which is not known from any other protein, appears to be responsible for the energy transduction within the complex by mechanical nanoscale coupling.  Transferred to the technical world, this could be described as a power transmission by a coupling rod, which connects for instance the wheels of a steam train.  This new nano-mechanical principle will now be analysed by additional functional studies and a refined structural analysis.”

Great news in learning about the respiratory transport chain in mitochondria which includes coupling rods that act like little locomotives. These locomotives work 24 hours a day, seven days a week in the body. So what was the significance of using evolution to understand this discovery? Darwinian evolution denies designed with intelligence and a purpose in nature. In reality, it had no explanatory power whatsoever, engineering models are being used instead to understand the control principles of this biological phenomenon! So let’s get rid of the storytellers and hire the engineers!

New fossil Discoveries Worldwide Showing A Pattern

Considering to be one of the strongest evidences for evolving species but new fossils that are currently turning up all over the world have a unique common theme, they all look similar to modern species of today!  It creates an ever growing part of complexity in Darwinism as they try to explain not more evolution but the lack of it found in the fossils.

Let’s start off by the most ancient pelican discovered so far, evolutionists deem it’s age to be 30 million years old.  The BBC reports, “What has surprised them most about this ancient pelican is that it is almost identical to modern species…Another added…”It is so similar to modern pelicans, despite its 30 million years,” Dr Antoine Louchart of the University of Lyon, France told the BBC.

Cretaceous bones with gnawing marks were found and claimed to be 75 million years old, these marks found on the bones was said to resemble, “The marks stood out for me because I remember seeing the gnaw marks on the antlers of a deer my father brought home when I was young” said Nicholas Longrich of Yale. Interesting, rodent tooth marks that have not changed much over a course of  the evolutionary time frame, 75 million years.

PNAS believes our ancestors from a million years ago have the same teeth we do today. This indicates the youth had a prolonged childhood , just like modern children have before the evolutionary story has Cro-Magnon man overtaking the Neanderthals in Europe! This adds more complexity to Darwinism which gauges intelligence and language by the size of their brains which brings up the question, why didn’t culture and civilization originate sooner?  What was going on for almost 995,000 years?

More discoveries on human cultural remains shows that we humans haven’t changed much either. In a story in physorg a new set of cave paintings in Romania dated in the evolutionary time frame of about 35,000 years old that show black-paint drawings of a horse, bear, buffalo and rhinoceros – the human propensity for representational art.

Another was the world’s oldest leather shoe found in a cave in Armenia which was remarkably preserved. Dated to have been made around 3500BCE. It was so amazing and surprising for evolutionists because this very ancient shoe resembled a modern one!

Evolutionists attempt to acclimate these findings in a geological scheme to make it appear that there has been progressive change but what has been observed is abrupt and complex life. Fossils have been discovered in the wrong place at the wrong time for the evolutionary model. Darwinian history is a myth with no foundation.

The reliance on a complex story as a result of so many falsifications then denies what has been observed by making absurd claims that the animals for some unknown reason were just able resist an all-encompassing force of Natural Selection!  Don’t they call this, stuff happens philosophy? While complexity abounds in evolution, these new discoveries are verifying creationism!

More Darwinian Logic: Cladogram Methodology

Evolutionists argue, “Life does not progress up a hierarchical ladder from “low” to “high” but is a branching bush with numerous lineages splitting apart and coexisting simultaneously.” Darwin had a concept of a bush from the beginning, and the only diagram that appeared in his first edition.  Continuing with the evolutionist argument, “For example, apes and humans split from a common ancestor 7 million years ago and both lineages are still around.”

A question comes to mind, where is the common ancestor that was supposedly alive seven million years ago? It’s neither living nor in the fossil record so how do they know it had ever existed?

“For this reason the concept of “missing link” is a misleading one. A transitional form does not need to be a perfect halfway house directly linking one group of organisms to another. It merely needs to record aspects of evolutionary change that occurred as one lineage split from another.”

This is where Cladogram Methodology comes into play. Between 385 and 360 million years ago, they say, “a lineage of fleshy-finned vertebrates evolved four legs and, eventually, the ability to walk on land. The steps of this transition are recorded in the fossils, some of which are shown here. Many other lines of evidence, including stratigraphy, comparative anatomy, and genetic comparisons among modern organisms, support this hypothesis.”

It is interesting to note, this defender of evolution uses “hypothesis” which would be the correct science term for what he is describing. However, he is not establishing the concept of ancestor-descendant rather the animals are arranged subjectively by only similarities. You have a drawing of nine different animals with lines that give the reader the impression the animals evolved from a common ancestor.

Does a diagram establish phylogenetic relationships? There are many examples of ray-finned fish, lungfish and living tetrapods as well as fossils. So the evidence exists with the tips of the cladogram. However, do we have evidence of the common ancestor that gave rise to the living tetrapods and fossil tulerpeton, as required by the intersection of their lines? The answer is no, we do not! So the diagram is not establishing phylogenetic relationships.

All we have is an arrangement of  animals which includes, fossil and living, into a sequence according to various characteristics. This is where creationists differ with evolutionists, a cladogram does not prove the existence of a common ancestor regardless if you think evolution is fact or not. They use Darwinian logic quite often in their arguments and it’s quite flawed and of course is not scientific either but rather it’s displaying a story through a cladogram that replaces physical evidence or lack thereof.