Creationists believe nature is designed with a purpose from a highly advanced and loving being, namely God. There is no story that requires one to conceptualize numerous revisions and updates when falsifications are discovered. Rather, learning about the actual advanced design of nature is the only thing that gets updated. Readers in secular publications are always promised that “clues about evolution” are being discovered, but are they?
New Scientist seems to think so…
“For the first time, a systematic protein interaction map—or interactome—has been constructed for a plant…The map shows that “there are few proteins that are highly connected,” said Christian Landry, an assistant professor of Biology at Laval University, who did not participate in the research. “This kind of structure gives robustness to the network because if you target proteins randomly, you are more likely to hit peripheral proteins” and not significantly disrupt cell function.”
When mapped 8,000 proteins which is about 30 percent of the plant’s protein-encoding gene in order to observe how they network together when inserted into yeast cells did not fulfill evolutionary expectations…
“The researchers also looked at the impact of these networks on evolution. The protein products of duplicated genes, for example, might be expected to take on different functions, as one can maintain the original task while the other is free to accumulate mutations. But the researchers found that most gene duplicates in Arabidopsis tended to interact with many of the same proteins, even though those duplicates had originated more than 700 million years ago, suggesting that the interactome somehow reduces the freedom of duplicated proteins to diverge.”
Wait a minute! Gene duplication followed by subsequent mutations is considered to be the mechanism for adding new information to the genome which in turn provides new functions to the organism! This is how evolutionary scientist claim that man came from things like bacteria.
This is not the only study to falsify evolution’s prediction on gene duplication, back in 2008 galactose use pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, commonly known as baker’s yeast was studied. Rather than observing new functions, scientists only observed functions diving among two or more genes! In other words, the function was going downhill rather than uphill to new functions.
In this recent study which confirms the previous one on gene duplication, evolutionary scientists expanded the story of evolution by suggesting yeast, worms, and humans have all come to the same design when evolving independently for two billion years! Isn’t this invoking a miracle or was this something natural selection planned all along?
This is another example of trying to rescue evolution from major disaster by suggesting it goes up or down or sideways, fast or slow, you name it they claimed it can do it all. I call it prediction modifications where evolutionary scientists fit in the contrary data to make it sound like it was expected all along which is something that is used quite often in evolution. A theory could never be falsified by this method which is based on blind faith rather than allowing the evidence to go where it may lead which is creationism!