Space Shuttle Missions Come To An End: What Next?

The space shuttle missions began on 12 April 1981, and ended on 14 April as it returned to earth. Former president Regan believed in building a space station, that would lead to new technologies. Thirty years later, on June 8, 2011, the last mission was launched, carrying with it a year’s supply to the international space station which was under former president Clinton, scaled back as far as possible and now discontinued under President Obama.  It was the 37th shuttle mission to the space station.

Science Daily reports…

“With today’s final launch of the space shuttle we turn the page on a remarkable period in America’s history in space, while beginning the next chapter in our nation’s extraordinary story of exploration,” Administrator Charles Bolden said. “Tomorrow’s destinations will inspire new generations of explorers, and the shuttle pioneers have made the next chapter of human spaceflight possible.”

Former President Bush seen this coming, the end of the shuttle missions so what next for America’s space program? Bush envisioned a manned flight to Mars and a space station on the moon rather than having NASA just manufacturing robots and launchers. Bush encountered much opposition towards a Mars mission so he settled on the moon one instead. But NASA’s director became incompetent with the work for the new direction that NASA was taking under Bush. So the President replaced him with a new director and things were back on track.

America’s housing market was sliding down at record rates, many Americans were released from their jobs, and the government wanted to bail out the bankers who gave out loans to a vast number of unqualified people for 12 years who after 5 years were unable to pay their mortgages when the interest rate went up. Democrats have a history of scaling down the space program even in good economic times. Since NASA was not as important as the bankers on wallstreet, President Obama killed the mission to the moon.

So now what? Last year, President Obama announced that there would be a manned mission that would be visiting an asteroid by 2025 and not only that but it could save the earth too! There have been science fiction movies about the fear of a huge asteroid hitting the planet’s surface. And not only that but very large asteroids are also used in explanations on why various ‘theories’ are failing expectations in our solar system. Is this mission cheaper than going to the moon without building a station there? The asteroid mission would require greater precision and perhaps even more risky.

“Astronauts have been to the moon and it’s time to do something new, Obama said.”  Really, so there is nothing more to learn about the moon then as Astronauts dug three inches into the surface and did some other things too, right President Obama? Is the President doing this for the sake it’s new or because it was former former President Bush’s idea that Americans should return to the moon?

Don’t get me wrong, doing new things with space exploration is a fabulous idea as it has turned up much evidence that confirms creationism but when the funds are tight, then we should focus on the things we can most learn from rather than for the sake of it being “new.” Right? It will be interesting to see how well this mission will hold up under a new President, then the question will be asked again, what next? For the space program.

Advertisements

5 thoughts on “Space Shuttle Missions Come To An End: What Next?

  1. @Michael,

    Space Shuttle Missions Come To An End: What Next?…..

    I don’t know what’s next, but whatever it is, it falsifies evolution.

  2. Don’t get me wrong, doing new things with space exploration is a fabulous idea as it has turned up much evidence that confirms creationism

    Please list below any actual observations of instances of creation that space exploration has turned up.

    ________

    That should be more than enough room for all of them.

  3. What Next?

    What next for manned space flight?

    Unfortunately, manned space flight has contributed hardly anything at all to scientific knowledge. That’s why astronomers push for remote landers, space telescopes, and other unmanned projects. As we are finding out here on earth, with drone aircraft and robot warriors, the extra work required to sustain and protect a human operator is costly and unproductive.

    For many years, physicist Robert Park was the American Physical Society’s Washington representative, interfacing with government officials in all branches. In his book on pseudoscience, Voodoo Science (Oxford University 2001), he calls the American manned spaceflight program a worthless exercise. As a political program, it may have had some merit—yes, it rallied Americans and gave them a sense of pride and human striving. But, scientifically? Almost zero.

    As we go beyond the lower boundary of outer space, supporting human needs becomes more and more difficult. Metal and silicon don’t care about radiation, but by the time humans returned from a Mars trip, they would be walking dead men. Ultimately, it will be worthwhile to mine the asteroids, and that will probably require humans on the scene.. Here, Obama has the right idea about relative technical importance. (Although perhaps not political issues.)

    Personally, I think it’s time to resurrect an idea from the mid-1970s, first put forward by a physicist at Princeton. I have his book, but can’t locate it at the moment. His plan was to build colonies in space around the earth, at the Lagranian points. Materials would be shot from the Earth, and later from the Moon, using rail guns. Ultimately, each colony would hold 20-50 million people, using solar power at 10 times the energy budget of people now on Earth. Each colony would spin to provide artificial gravity, and would be large enough to have its own rainfall. Others have occasionally resurrected the idea. T.A. Heppenheimer’s Colonies in Space (Warner 1980) is one source.

    After all the hoopla about manned space travel, with so few scientific results, it would be nice to start on a space project that would actually do people a lot of good. But politicians keep throwing money at the glitzy stuff with space suits and recycling toilets

    The US space effort is not worthless, it’s just mired in irrelevance. And it’s in danger because we can no longer afford irrelevance.

  4. . . . . . . Space Shuttle Missions Come To An End: What Next?

    Well, the Russians seem to be willing to let us thumb rides with them for the foreseeable future.

    Baikonur, here wa come! (Right back where we started from..)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s