In creationism, the fall of Adam was a symbol of nature regressing rather than progressing. The DNA for example, was much better during Adam’s time than it is now. In Darwinism, nature is generally evolving in a progressing state and always raises more questions than answers in its ever growing complexity.
A first ever generational mutation experiment was conducted for the purpose of finding out how many mutations does a child have and which parent gave them the most.
Science Daily reports…
“The researchers measured directly the numbers of mutations in two families, using whole genome sequences from the 1000 Genomes Project. The results also reveal that human genomes, like all genomes, are changed by the forces of mutation: our DNA is altered by differences in its code from that of our parents. Mutations that occur in sperm or egg cells will be ‘new’ mutations not seen in our parents.”
“Although most of our variety comes from reshuffling of genes from our parents, new mutations are the ultimate source from which new variation is drawn. Finding new mutations is extremely technically challenging as, on average, only 1 in every 100 million letters of DNA is altered each generation.”
The results were a surprise for evolutionary scientists, who would have thought it, right? One, two or even three mutations in a generation is serious business. Because natural selection would have to choose many beneficial ones to overcome the flood of the negative ones, most of which are nearly-neutral mistakes that accumulate, like typographic errors, to cause genetic deterioration.
60 mutations in a human is quite a lot particularly if this data is forced into the old age assumption because humans could not possibly have lived for millions of years at this rate of mutational degradation! Now with this problem, circular reasoning is invoked into the story of evolution, where it supposedly happened because it happened until enlightenment is granted or coming up with another creative story.
Despite our growing intelligence in knowledge, our progressing technology, and advancements in medicine, we are not evolving (read: genetic entropy observed). In fact, modern humans of today are all less fit genetic wise than Neanderthals and ancient Greeks were in their time! This basically confirms creationism prediction of nature!