The Amazing Engineered Design In The Color Of Feathers

There are quite a number of variants in the Birds of Paradise which has been a fascination for many years to the oldest and largest organization devoted on the study of birds. These amazing creatures contain “a glossy orange colouring, and the exquisite delicacy of the loosely waving feathers…”

Microscopes that use a particle beam of electrons to illuminate a specimen which then produces a magnified image with more resolving power than an optical microscope has been instrumental in learning about these amazing birds! Scientists are just beginning to comprehend how the feathers are able to flash with such intense colors. Scientists now know that these colors are not produced by pigments but by organized and specified complex geometrical patterns.

There are at least three dozen variants of this speicies!

In current biology, Pete Vukusic writes…

“The performance and function of such simpler systems as biological multilayers are well recognized, but despite recent progress in the use and development of measurement and modeling techniques in this area, there are many other structurally coloured systems whose detailed action and function are poorly understood.”

“This is largely due to the morphological complexity of their systems’ inherent photonic structures, which makes it difficult to discern their role and effectiveness.  Photonic effects arising from complex system designs are usually attributed generically to coherent scattering and their purpose ascribed generally to conspecific communication or to camouflage.  This is rather too vague, however, and it invariably overlooks strategic design features that have key implications in aspects of display behaviour.”


Iridescent flashing doesn’t just happen by chance.  The design involves control at the microscopic level in three dimensions with a fourth dimension of time in the way the male manipulates the feathers for optimal effect. Why would a bird invest so much energy in these tiny little microscopic mechanisms?  Vukusi points out that these structures are costly to create. “Such are the costs and, invariably, such is the optical efficiency and the optimisation of the systems’ designs, that significant biological function should genuinely be served.”

Not only are the birds feathers are amazingly designed but the article itself is amazing because it demonstrates that one can conduct scientific research without Darwinian evolution involved. It’s even quite remarkable that Vukusic doesn’t even mention evolution one time. There are those who confuse the term “science” with evolution, but they are not one in the same, otherwise no scientific research could be conducted without the assumption it evolved somehow. Vukusic in his study did mention, feather design, adaptation, and purpose which leaves the reader to conclude on his or her own on the origin (God, intelligent design or evolution). This is a great example of what secular science journals should imitate.

What we have here is science that adults and students alike can learn about these amazingly designed feathers, rather than reading about some invented story about how butterflies and birds arrived at these superior designs by “convergent evolution” or how natural selection somehow paid a high cost of photonic crystals so it could pass on bird genes or some observation that falsifies evolution where scientists praise the discovery leaving a project for them to force the data into a particular framework.  The article overall represents a job well done with more to come!

Advertisements

6 thoughts on “The Amazing Engineered Design In The Color Of Feathers

  1. Not only are the birds feathers are amazingly designed but the article itself is amazing because it demonstrates that one can conduct scientific research without Darwinian evolution involved. It’s even quite remarkable that Vukusic doesn’t even mention evolution one time

    The article never mentioned evolution, but evolution is never far from Michael’s mind. Or, rather, his obsessive need to prove it wrong, in all its guises—common ancestry, big-bang theory, embryonic stem cells, and climate change.

    So what is the big news in this post?

    An Actual Scientist, speaking of a new discovery published in an Actual Science Journal, used the words “design” and “complex” to describe the structure of a bird’s coloration system.

    Apparently Michael believes that this proves, beyond a scintilla of doubt, that said Actual Scientist admits that the universe was created in six 24-hour days, and is only 6.034 years old.[1]

    And, if an Actual Scientist admits this, then it must be true. For, as Michael persists in reminding us, Scientists are never wrong when they agree with Michael’s beliefs.[2]

    True, the technique Michael uses here does enjoy wide currency in theology. Things are what they are labeled. If we label an act—picking one’s nose in public, say—as a “Sin,” then that act is Wrong, because all sins are Evil. So the mere act of applying a word to something imbues that thing with all the characteristics of the word. Calling birds’ feathers “designed” converts them magically from a natural phenomenon to a preconceived plan whipped up by an external agent as a parlor trick.

    Remember the brouhaha several years ago when creationists tried desperately to show that Darwin renounced evolution on his deathbed? What the sam hill were they trying to prove? They fervently believed that they could falsify the theory of evolution by showing that its founder no longer “believed” in it.

    To which the rest of us replied, as we do now,

    BWAAAHAAAAHAAAHAAAHAAHA.

    =============

    [1] Give or take a little for leap years, which were made necessary because God had slightly miscalculated the length of the sidereal year.

    [2] When they disagree with Michael, of course, they are as wrong as a left-handed screwdriver.

  2. The weird thing here is that while Michael is trying to claim the “color” in feathers is “designed,” he is overlooking the fossil evidence for the evolution of feathers; starting from “fiber-like” fuzz on some feathered dinosaurs, onward. Since we know from the fossil record that feathers evolved, it is not a leap to assume that the color also is a product of evolution.

  3. There are quite a number of variants in the Birds of Paradise which has been a fascination for many years to the oldest and largest organization devoted on the study of birds.

    We do fervently hope Michael realizes that the second photo in his post is not a bird, but a flower.

    We might wonder why he includes a flower in a post about coloration of feathers?

  4. What a close minded idiot. You cant even distinguish between a PLANT and a bird, and I’m supposed to read this as if you know what you are talking about, or even that you are NOT an idiot. Idiot.

  5. Greetings OGCutter,

    It’s funny when you use the term “close minded” when labeling me as though your claiming that your “open minded.” By your comment, you are not an open minded person when it comes to other viewpoints.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s