Mysterious Phenomena Happening On Titan

What’s going on with Saturn’s largest moon? Observations show lakes are appearing and disappearing which means the lakes are shallow and the liquid hydrocarbons in them are moving around. These lakes predominantly contain methane  and ethane.  In 2004, new dark areas was discovered in Arrakis Planitia near the south. These lakes have shrunk considerably in a span of 44 months.

A new paper and photo…Lake Ontario Lacus, which was discovered on the south pole, its shoreline has shrunk by 5.5 to 7 miles. Estimates of shrinkage is a bit tricky, while it’s not practical to measure these lakes directly, estimates show how much Arrakis gained and lost as a proxy which are based on estimates from 2004, containing the methane-carrying capacity cloud system where the cloudburst must have declined 2.4 to 14 cm of methane rain into the Arrakis basin (upper limit 4.2 m).  This yields estimates that between 24 to 140 km3 of liquid was lost at Arrakis in 4 years from a combination of evaporation and infiltration; probably similar amounts at Ontario.

Interesting to note, the northern lakes  in Titan have not declined between observations. This makes it even more interesting to watch what the “methane cycle” does to the southern and northern lakes as the seasons change and more sunlight hits the north.

Another thing to watch for is the lake bottom not being dark, as might be expected from sedimentation of hydrocarbons.  Either some sort of wave action cleansed the bottom as the shoreline retreated, or any sediments are light colored.  The authors favor the sediments being light-colored latter, saying that “bright organic condensates may be deposited within the lakes and exposed as the liquid level drops (Barnes et al., 2009).” This view is strengthened by the fact that the Cassini orbiter’s cameras saw numerous dark features in the south in 2004-2005, but light material as Ontario retreated.  It is not possible to know from albedo (reflected brightness) alone the composition of the bright sediments.

One can take a look back in history in all of this, in 1981 when Voyager I made its visit, scientists discovered an irreversible erosion of atmospheric methane was precipitating hydrocarbons onto the surface (especially ethane, which doesn’t have a way to get back into the atmosphere), scientists expected to find, over the course of 4.5 billion years, an accumulation of half a kilometer or more of liquid ethane in a global ocean.

The prediction of liquid ethane based on an assumption of Titan being 4.5 billion years old was later falsified in a specular way by the Cassini observations! In fact, the Huygens probe had been designed to float on that ocean predicted by scientists but that failed to come true. Instead, scientists discovered on Titan to have paltry accumulations of liquid in scattered lakes near the poles, while the equatorial regions are largely covered in icy sand dunes!

Now the sediments are bright, which would be surprising in itself, so one asks, “is there enough sediment to account for 4.5 billion years of deposition?”  In addition, Titan, the largest moon with the greatest gravitational attraction, accounts for only a few craters (three to five) after all that time. You may be asking with these observations, could  there been processes go on for billions of years? Many scientists are forced into a particular timescale, evolution happened slowly and gradually with the planets and stars. So what evolution sounds best at is when the evidence is speculated upon an unseen. These type of explanations had been invoked for the falsifications done by the probes on Titan.

For example, somehow the ethane seeped into the interior where no one can find it; maybe the interior has a methane reservoir that erupts through cryovolcanoes, replenishing the atmosphere; maybe this, maybe that.  If these scientists stick to the observations being discovered and draw reasonable conclusions from data alone, they would have to conclude that there are severe upper limits on how long Titan has been acting this way! The phenomena happening on Titan verifies, a Creator namely God!

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “Mysterious Phenomena Happening On Titan

  1. @Michael,

    One can take a look back in history in all of this, in 1981 when Voyager I made its visit, scientists discovered an irreversible erosion of atmospheric methane was precipitating hydrocarbons onto the surface (especially ethane, which doesn’t have a way to get back into the atmosphere), scientists expected to find, over the course of 4.5 billion years, an accumulation of half a kilometer or more of liquid ethane in a global ocean.

    Michael puts emphasis on the term “irreversible erosion.” I could be wrong, but I suspect that he is trying to use a varient of the “erosion rates” argument which goes something like this: “Uniformitatianism claims all rates are the same through all time. The current rate of erosion is too fast, so therefore the said object has to be younger than 4.5 billion years.” — That said, if this is what Michael wishes to convey, then it only shows that he doesn’t know what the term “uniformitarianism” means. It doesn’t mean that all rates remain constant throughout all of nature, but rather that the natural processes we know today have always existed. It doesn’t matter if the rate changes or not since modern uniformitarian principle makes no such claim.

    Besides, we know for a fact that erosion rates change drastically. For example, research done in the last decade show that the erosion/sedimentation rate that is currently happening now has actually began within the last 5 million years; in that amount of time, the erosion/sedimentation rate has more than tripled from the last rate that was before that (from between 5 to 10 million years ago.) How do we know this? Because of layers on the ocean floor from the sedimentation and from their test results. [1]

    Even if an eroison is irreversible, it doesn’t mean that the materials do not ever get replaced. There are forces active within the earth, and yes even in Titan, that bring forth new materials. Even if materials do not get replaced at the same location, they may be offset on another location.

    The phenomena happening on Titan verifies, a Creator namely God!

    Michael, explain! How does the conclusion follow? I cannot see it….And even if you were right, how would this jive well for your “earth is special” attitude? If God is working on Titan, wouldn’t that indicate that God has other concerns besides us here on earth? That said, wouldn’t that mean that we are not the center of God’s plan?

    ——————————————-
    [1] Peizhe, Zhan, en et., (19 April 2001) Increased sedimentation rates and grain sizes 2±4 Myr ago due to the infuence of climate change on erosion rates. Nature 410, 891-897. Full text available at http://www.fsl.orst.edu/wpg/events/W03/zhang_molnar.pdf

  2. Michael: “Many scientists are forced into a particular timescale, evolution happened slowly and gradually with the planets and stars. ”

    Forced ??? And why should planets and stars evolve slowly ?
    Never heard of supernovae, for example ?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s