In the Bible it says, animals reproduce after their own kind, however in evolution it’s a story of dead chemicals which formed then turning into life and those living creations branched out into many different animals suited for particular environments.
“And God said, Let the waters bring forth abundantly the moving creature that hath life, and fowl that may fly above the earth in the open firmament of heaven.”
“And God created great whales, and every living creature that moveth, which the waters brought forth abundantly, after their kind, and every winged fowl after his kind: and God saw that it was good.”
“And God blessed them, saying, Be fruitful, and multiply, and fill the waters in the seas, and let fowl multiply in the earth. And the evening and the morning were the fifth day. And God said, Let the earth bring forth the living creature after his kind, cattle, and creeping thing, and beast of the earth after his kind: and it was so.
And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that it was good.” -Genesis 1:20-25.
A fossil known as ‘Miacis’ uintensis’ was unpacked from a long shelf life that was over a hundred years. The reason why it was stored was so that future evolutionary information would be able have explanatory power in the Darwinian tree of life. However, it did have four other explanations prior to this latest one. Here is what they found with today’s knowledge…
“An analysis of 99 traits among 29 fossils and 15 living taxa resulted in a new evolutionary tree that shows that ‘M.’ uintensis is distantly related to the type specimens from the Miacis genus, suggesting that an extensive revision of the current understanding of the evolutionary relationships among early carnivore fossils may be needed.
But more significantly, the structure of the evolutionary tree suggests that adaptations to terrestrial or semi-terrestrial locomotion were more common than previously suspected in early fossil carnivores, preceding the split between the two major groups of living Carnivora, the Caniformia (a group that includes dogs, weasels, bears, seals and their relatives) and Feliformia (cats, hyenas, mongooses and civets). “
It appears they were disappointed with the results. What they expected from a primitive carnivore didn’t pan out, it was actually a species that had plenty of diversity of lifestyles which has been observed in modern carnivores. Nothing has evolved here only the imagination of evolutionists.
Another fossil (Mammalodon colliveri) which has been also shelved for a pretty long time as well since 1939 was studied again. This animal was touted as a great new discovery to explain mysteries of whale evolution. Whales are thought to have evolved from a dog-like land animal.
According to Dr. Fitzgerald as he studied the fossil, “This indicates early and varied experimentation in the evolution of baleen whales.” Fitzgerald when on to say, he believed “The Origin of Species” was correct and that “some of the earliest baleen whales may have been suction feeders.” Not so fast Dr. Fitzgerald, after closer reading we find, Mammalodon colliveri was already considered a primitive toothed baleen whale, one of the group of whales that contains the blue whale.
Mammalodon is a dwarf, by claiming it evolved from a larger whale would not indicate evolution but rather regression within it’s own kind.