The WASP project had discovered a planet that falsifies the nebular hypothesis. A planet’s orbit is going the wrong way according to what they believe how the universe works. In order to explain this falsification, they add it to the list of collisions or near collisions with no evidence. How could an outside force with unbelievable and astronomical gravity be able with precision, slow the planet known as Wasp-17 down and then reverse it’s orbit without ripping it apart? Not possible! There is nothing in the known universe that has been observed which fits such a description to verify its existence.
Another rapid process baffles astronomers which is suppose to be slow in evolutionary thinking…
“Planets form out of swirling disks of gas and dust. Spitzer observed infrared light coming from one such disk around a young star, called LRLL 31, over a period of five months. To the astronomers’ surprise, the light varied in unexpected ways, and in as little time as one week. Planets take millions of years to form, so it’s rare to see anything change on time scales we humans can perceive.”
The Universe is not as old as these astronomers claim it is with their faulty speculation on how planets are formed while things in the space are moving much faster indicating it’s youthfulness. Looking forward to see what else Spitzer is able to observe.
A paper called; “Cosmology at a Crossroads” written by Charles L. Bennett (Johns Hopkins) gives us an historical background about what he believes are pivotal discoveries that propelled 20th century cosmology: Hubble’s expansion, Zwicky’s dark matter, Penzias and Wilson’s cosmic microwave background (CMB), and Guth’s inflationary cosmology.
“A fundamental question in cosmology is, “How did the universe begin?” The two pivotal ideas of inflation and cold dark matter (CDM), combined with extensive observational results, including the unpredicted accelerated expansion of the universe, underpin a new standard model of cosmology.”
“However, the big bang theory only describes the expansion and cooling but says nothing about the origin of the universe. Within the standard model, the beginning of the universe is effectively “inflation,” the rapid expansion of a tiny region of space to astronomical scales. Inflation is a paradigm that encompasses a wide range of specific implementations that are at the intersection of quantum and gravity theories, the two great but incompatible theories of 20th century physics. Measurements of inflation not only will probe the origin of the universe but also may help reveal the basic structure of physics itself.”
Here Bennett tries to claim inflation makes predictions, and it can be measured. Let me remind Mr Bennett inflation is not observable data, also he states; “Inflation is a paradigm that encompasses a wide range of specific implementations that are at the intersection of quantum and gravity theories, the two great but incompatible theories of 20th century physics.”
I will give him credit and the rest, it takes a lot of imagination to come up with this stuff. The Inflation story is nothing more than trying to rescue the big bang from not one but three observational falsifications, the horizon problem, the flatness problem, and of course, the lumpiness problem. Eternal energy has been inserted for the problem of the universe being created out of nothing which defies the laws of physics. All this speculation doesn’t serve the public at large, but rather job security (funding) and story telling.