DNA is the source Darwinians rely upon their story for evidence on how evolution is supposedly able to create brand new information using mutations. These mutations in turn are supposedly able to one animal into another over a vast period of time with small changes.
Darwinians interpret DNA similarities as to determine what animals are closer to other animals. For example, humans share about 98.4 per cent of their DNA with chimps, 97.5 percent with gorillas and 96.5 percent with orangutans. Therefore, according to evolutionists, chimps rather than orangutans are our closest relatives.
Similarities has been causing the hypothesis evolution mounting problems, namely the Organguatan. In the Journal of Biogeography (June 2009) written by scientists at the University of Pittsburgh and the Buffalo Museum of Science, shows this sophisticated animal was found to have many similarities. These similarities include features like anatomy, reproductive biology and behavior with humans. These similarities with mankind are more than any other great ape but according to evolution, this couldn’t be so because the DNA of a chimp has more similarities.
“They have good morphological evidence in support of their interpretation, so that must be taken seriously, and if it reopens the debate between molecular biologists and morphologists, so much the better. They are going against accepted interpretations of human and ape relationships, and there’s no doubt their conclusions will be challenged.”
“But I hope it will be done in a constructive way, for science progresses by asking questions and testing results,” the former head of the Human Origins department at the London Natural History Museum, Anthropologist Peter Andrews, says of the new research.”
It would be safe to assume if it weren’t for DNA, evolutionists would claim the orangutan rather than the chimp would be the one pictured next to the human in the evolutionary tree.
“Palaeoanthropology is based solely on morphology, and there is no scientific justification to favor DNA over morphological data. Yet the human-chimp relationship, generated by molecular data, has been accepted without any scrutiny.”
The problem with prevailing viewpoints in evolution not only effects science but defenders of evolution as well. The dogma declared like Pope speak and then supposedly no longer viewed with any scrutiny in the majority of the scientific community. This is classic reason why students ought to be taught critical thinking in science as the likes of Orangutan messes up the evolutionary tree.