Ever since Cassini has been exploring the planet Saturn, scientists unwittingly have turned up evidence for creationism rather than revealing a very old appearance consisting of billions of years old.
One of the ways scientists were trying to fit it’s youthful appearance into their framework of an old Universe was with through the use of a computer simulation. The program came up with a scenario in which “particles could be colliding, fragmenting, and re-clumping, thus maintaining a fresh look for millions of years.” It was admitted, it’s not clear if re-clumping does occur because under that sort of situation it would have caused the moons to be pushed further out. Saturn’s rings appear brand new, bright and shiny and they should be considering the Universe is not that old!
Methane in the sky under the bombardment of solar winds observed on Titan has been perplexing for many evolutionary scientists, “the lifetime of Titan’s atmospheric methane was straightforwardly calculated to be a few percent of the age of the solar system.” The solar bombardment over a very long period of time would have eliminated the methane in the sky but yet the substance remains. This caused speculation of supply sources either external or internal. External was ruled out, because there was not enough impacts to supply the methane, which leaves the internal source hypothesis.
Another problem with Titan was on the surface, it was predicted with calculations within it’s supposedly old age framework, the moon would have an global ocean of liquid ethane. The Huygens probe was supposed to be a floating device. As it turned out, there is not that much of ethane on the surface of Titan. The billion dollar question, where did the substance go? Vaporization doesn’t come easily for ethane which indicates a young age.
The Institute for Creation Research points out…
“Another indicator of youth is that Enceladus, one of Saturn’s moons photographed on Cassini’s latest flyby, is spewing ice into space in a giant plume, like a water faucet with the handle stuck on.”
“The spray of icy particles from the surface jets collectively forms a towering plume three times taller than the width of Enceladus. Evolutionary scientists do not have an explanation for why Enceladus still retains enough material to continue supplying the fountain, as well as enough energy to keep the pressure on.”
“What causes and controls the jets is a mystery.” Like Saturn’s rings, Enceladus shows no hint of being 4.5 billion years old, but instead appears remarkably young. There are also clear signs of youth on another of Saturn’s moon, Titan, which does not have the oceans of ethane or the myriad of craters that naturalistic models predicted.”
It’s true, evolutionary scientists haven’t come up with viable explanations on why their model predictions have been off, but it doesn’t mean they will not be able to come up with an explanation even though that particular explanation is not a viable one. One has to keep in mind, those searching for the naturalistic explanation have to fit the evidence into their models rather than the other way around. But it’s quite a good fit with the creationist model and it demonstrates once again, it’s more way accurate than the presentation of naturalism.