McLeroy Under Fire Again By Special Interests

The process of revising the science standards in Texas has been a focus on major debate by many people. Since the chairmen of the education board is a creationist, we see many of the old arguments being displayed on such online publications like the American-Statesmen for example…

“McLeroy’s critics, who include many Texas scientists, accuse him of trying to undermine a multitude of scientific evidence that supports evolution and replace it with a discussion of the supernatural in public schools.”

This statement is false, firstly public schools are currently unable by law to mention God as the creator. Secondly, McLeroy’s discussion on some of the weaknesses in the fossil record concerning “gradualism” was about quoting well known defenders of evolution. In his presentation made available by podcast, McLeroy begins by pointing out in a book by Ernst Mayr which considers evolution as fact, says the earliest fossils we have to date around 3.5 billion years old, show no changes whatsoever.  Another point McLeroy makes in the same book concerning the human brain where proponent of evolution Ernst Mayr says has not  changed one bit over a course of about 150 million years.

The Structure of Evolutionary Theory, a book written by Stephen J. Gould in 2002 but was also republished in part back in 2007 was another author McLeroy used to show the weakness of “gradualism” in the fossil record.

Stephen J. Gould helped develop a theory called; “Punctuated equilibrium” in 1980 to explain why the fossil record was showing abrupt appearances while showing a lack of major change in animals. Only a rare number of fossils have been interpreted as transitional forms. Punctuated equilibrium suggests little change (not very noticeable if at all) in the animals during their lifespan but when evolution does occur it’s a rapid change branching out into different species.

On page 749 in Stephen J. Gould’s book, “The last resemblance of a species looks pretty much like the first one.” Basically the same concept Richard Dawkins advocates where nature looks designed, but it’s an illusion, here Gould suggests basically the same thing, even though it’s appearance in the fossil record is the same through the many generations, the species still underwent major evolutionary changes not just small within it’s own kind like what we observe all the time. In other words, what we see in the fossil record as “abrupt” or showing animals looking the same  is another illusion because it’s not fitting with the theory of evolution.

Nothing in McLeroy’s presentation in front of the educational board in Texas has anything to do with discussing the supernatural as Laura Heinauer of the Statemen would like to have us believe. Being critical of “gradualism” is not advocating God. Although, one can conclude that way, and perhaps this is what the fear of many proponents of evolution have so they staunchly fight for no weaknesses in evolution, while attacking those who support teaching weaknesses along side so-called strengths in evolution and anything that may appear as a weakness, they claim is another “illusion” which will eventually disappear as explanations progress.

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “McLeroy Under Fire Again By Special Interests

  1. Michael, they are not interested in facts only in keeping evolution as the center of attention and destroying any understanding of God.

    I do not remember if I pointed this out here before but the more evolutionist push their theory in government schools the more Americans keep pulling their children out and putting them in either Privately funded schools or home schooling them. In correlation, the more this all happens the higher the drug use, teen pregnancy, violence and lower test scores occurs.

    In regards to just homeschooling: “the weighted estimate of the number of students being homeschooled in the United States in the spring of 2003 was 1,096,000.” That’s a 29% increase from 1999. And if the level of education is being questioned, “their test scores are typically above average. On 1999’s SAT, “homeschoolers scored an average 1,083 (verbal 548, math 535), 67 points above the national average of 1,016.”

    So evolution does increase the scholastic level of schools, it kills it.

  2. You have a point there, mcoville

    Some of my friends have taught their kids at home rather than sending them to public school because of the very reason you outlined as well as other things like special interest groups, lack of discipline, drugs weapons. I graduated from a public school, I seen much violence, drug use, teachers frustration over students refusing to learn, not much parental support. I do not always blame the teaching method as sole cause because there are other factors as well but forcing evolution down people’s throats does not help increase grades. Yes, another good point! Those homeschooled have tested higher in SATs than those who went through the government’s system. One of my friends kids tested 2 to 3 years ahead of their public school counterparts.

  3. What is the idea behind your term ‘special interests’ ?

    It seems you think ‘evolution’ is special – which is odd, as it is THE standard theory of biology. And nobody is forcing this down to anyones throat. If you don’t believe it, fine !
    But it is what the overwhelming majority of scientists feel is the right model, so that should be taught.

    Unless you want *all* alternative models to be taught ? All versions of creationism, ID, and hundreds of creation theories dreamt up by hundreds of peoples ?

    I really think you want to teach the most successful model, the one that seems to work best. Seems to, because you never know for sure, but evolution is certainly the best bet at the moment. By far.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s