Supposedly 7,500 years earlier than Stonehenge or the Great Pyramid, and 6,000 years prior to what evolution deemed to be the earliest known writing, Gobeli Tepe has archaeologists shaking their heads in amazement and been bewildered by this discovery for more than ten years now. Also, it is believed there is much more under the surface which will keep archaeologists pretty busy for years to come.
What generally is not understood by evolutionists is always labeled as some sort of ritual, in this case it’s no exception. Last November the Smithsonian reported the findings at Gobeli Tepe as being the oldest temple discovered.
“Six miles from Urfa, an ancient city in southeastern Turkey, Klaus Schmidt has made one of the most startling archaeological discoveries of our time: massive carved stones about 11,000 years old, crafted and arranged by prehistoric people who had not yet developed metal tools or even pottery.”
“The megaliths predate Stonehenge by some 6,000 years. The place is called Gobekli Tepe, and Schmidt, a German archaeologist who has been working here more than a decade, is convinced it’s the site of the world’s oldest temple.”
But with further study, the monuments were found to be artistically advanced and not a temple which prompted further speculation as evolutionists are trying to fit it into a certain timetable. As the old saying in evolution goes, the older it is, the more simple it should be. But one has to keep in mind, dating methods are not a certainty by any means. Cosmic rays do play a factor in radiocarbon dating as surges can affect the data collected. There is no way to predict cosmic ray surges from the past or other factors that could affect the data as of yet we are unaware of.
Like I stated previously, the old evolutionary saying is, the older it is, the more simple it is, but one can’t really say this for the monuments found at Gobekli Tepe which look very well made with a clear sense of geometry and communication, not something you would find for for supposedly primitive humans.
This reminds me of the Chauvet Cave which I had written about in a previous post, what surprised evolutionists was they had dated the cave with all it’s paintings about 10,000 older than the ones found in Lascaux yet the paintings in the Chauvet Cave were clearly by far, more advanced artistically than the newer ones found at Lascaux.
There is enough evidence to cast a major doubts on pre-Sumerian history (which doesn’t agree with biblical history and is in conflict with newer discoveries) and I predict there will be more to come as scientists take a closer look at Gobekli Tepe or other sites which have yet to be discovered.