Peter Medawar who won the Nobel laureate for his work on tissue grafts and an evolutionist himself stated the following; ” I cannot give any scientist of any age better advice than this: the intensity of the conviction that a hypothesis is true has no bearing on whether it is true or not. The importance of the strength of our conviction is only to provide a proportionally strong incentive to find out if the hypothesis will stand up to critical examination.”
It had been reported by ICR, recent discovery of ancient footprints having been found to looked modern. Evolutionary scientists claim claim that these footprints found in Kenya are around 1.5 million years old. When it comes to fossil evidence for footprints, it confirms God’s Word as we shall see in a moment… Evolutionists have claimed as reported in Science…
“Hominin footprints offer evidence about gait and foot shape, but their scarcity, combined with an inadequate hominin fossil record, hampers research on the evolution of the human gait. Here, we report hominin footprints in two sedimentary layers dated at 1.51 to 1.53 million years ago (Ma) at Ileret, Kenya, providing the oldest evidence of an essentially modern human–like foot anatomy, with a relatively adducted hallux, medial longitudinal arch, and medial weight transfer before push-off.”
“The size of the Ileret footprints is consistent with stature and body mass estimates for Homo ergaster/erectus, and these prints are also morphologically distinct from the 3.75-million-year-old footprints at Laetoli, Tanzania. The Ileret prints show that by 1.5 Ma, hominins had evolved an essentially modern human foot function and style of bipedal locomotion.”
Interesting observation in light of the footprints found in Latoli Tanzania…
“Paleoanthropologist Russell Tuttle of the University of Chicago concluded, “In sum, the 3.4 million-year-old footprint trails at Laetoli site G resemble those of habitually unshod modern humans.” -ICR
The funny part of this particular research even the Laetoli footprints are not considered human by evolutionary scientists because it would go against the hypothesis which claims humans couldn’t have existed before creatures it had supposely evolved from. If it looks like a duck and sounds like a duck, it most certainly is a duck or in this case, the ancient footprints found do appear to be modern and yes, human too when one looks objectively at the fossil record. Again, this would confirm the Bible which states animals reproduce their own kind, and only variants of one’s own kind are able to reproduce (some call this micro-evolution).