Trying To Detect The Inflation Theory In Cosmology

Cosmic inflation has major problems within this hypothesis but has been nevertheless accepted as truth in cosmology. It’s contention is shortly after the big bang, the universe expanded faster than one can sneeze by an incredible billions upon trillions of miles. Now it has an extremely difficult task in trying to convince other scientists in a different field namely physicists by attempting to gather some key solid evidence for it.

The latest method in trying to detect so-called; inflation consists of placing a special instrument on a telescope at the South Pole. The research in being done by the University of Chicago. It’s mission is to look for gravitational waves left by a extremely high and very quick energy event (inflation).

Scientists are uncertain about a high energy event would actually leave a  gravitational wave signature. They expect to find an answer to this particular unknown in about 10 years from now. Keep in mind, theories based on naturalism always tend to want it both ways, and this experiment is no exception to the rule.

If a gravitational wave signature is somehow detected,  cosmologists would be declaring the hypothesis as “valid” for wider acceptance or undeniable evidence for the hypothesis. Now what if in ten years or more we see no gravitational wave signature being detected? Then what? No problem.  Lawrence Krauss of Arizona State claims that a failed mission in detecting a signature is consistent with the inflation hypothesis! If that’s the case, why attempt to detect a supposedly high energy phenomena from the past by observing gravitational waves at the South Pole? Again, they want to have it both ways!

There is also another major problem with trying to gather solid evidence for the inflation theory as stated below.

“We have these key components to our picture of the universe, but we really don’t know what physics produces any of them, said Scott Dodelson [U of Chicago], referring to inflation, dark energy and dark matter – the proposed stuff that makes up the universe’s missing mass.  ‘The goal of the next decade is to identify the physics.”

Outside observers of modern cosmology are not going to conclude the theory is factual especially when it’s key points in the inflation hypothesis itself are outside the realm of knowledge where it hasn’t been invented yet, or it will never be invented.

In conclusion, cosmic inflation is an hypothesis not a theory despite it’s acceptance in one particular area in science. Measurements known from Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe has indicated those observations have not solved any of it’s problems, also lack of solid evidence overall and the latest experiment at the South Pole will most likely not answer any questions either.

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “Trying To Detect The Inflation Theory In Cosmology

  1. Michael: “Cosmic inflation has major problems within this hypothesis but has been nevertheless accepted as truth in cosmology. ”

    Eh, well, no. *You* are saying it has major problems (which ones ?), cosmologists like myself would not say that. But of course it is not accepted as truth in cosmology: that is nonsense. I would put inflation in the category of ‘hypothesis’, not (yet) theory. This is far from accepted.
    And funnily, at the end of your post you say just that. So how can you start off with a first sentence like that ????

    Michael:
    “Scientists are uncertain about a high energy event would actually leave a gravitational wave signature. They expect to find an answer to this particular unknown in about 10 years from now.”

    OK, that’s fine, so it will be a yes, or a no, or a maybe. That’s what they expect (doesn’t have to be, obviously).

    “Keep in mind, theories based on naturalism always tend to want it both ways, and this experiment is no exception to the rule.”

    Where does this come from then ? Which two ways ? This is a very strange statement, without any basis whatsoever.

    Michael:
    “Outside observers of modern cosmology are not going to conclude the theory is factual especially when it’s key points in the inflation hypothesis itself are outside the realm of knowledge where it hasn’t been invented yet, or it will never be invented.”

    I guess only you know what you are trying to say here. I have no idea. Inflation is just a physical hypothesis, perfectly normal science. Yes, the scales are large, the expansion rate is high, but it is only a case of large numbers. It is just physics.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s