“Life is not a naturalistic phenomenon with unlimited evolutionary potential as Darwin proposed. It is intelligently designed, ruled by immutable laws, and survives only because it has a built-in facilitated variation mechanism for continually adapting to internal and external challenges and changes.” -Alex Williams
The purpose of this blog is to promote good science, a curiosity in science by students and adults alike, while showing God’s signature in nature as the creator and exposing evolutionary speculations and beliefs.
It’s my contention that evolution has skewed empirical science and has relied much on complex details which stem from imaginative storytelling. For example, plant evolution. Ten years ago, scientists were saying “we know now” but new discoveries have falsified their speculation which they believed were facts and these answers are to show themselves sometime in the future. Gaps are often times filled with imagination, much is covered about this aspect.
As Granville Sewell rightly phrases these 30 year old questions posed to evolutionists which is even more relevant for today…
“Why is it science to attribute the major steps of evolution to creativeness in the genes themselves, but not science to attribute them to creativeness originating outside the genes? We all agree that the human brain is capable of creativeness, so I would then respond: why is it science to attribute creativeness to one part of an organism and not to another?”
Skeptics often dismiss watchmaker argument claiming it just an analogy to all living things and living things are very much different than machines. However, as science has grown, bacteria the simplest form of life known to man with it’s own complexities, has a ticking clock inside of it.
“An endogenous circadian system in cyanobacteria exerts pervasive control over cellular processes, including global gene expression. Indeed, the entire chromosome undergoes daily cycles of topological changes and compaction.
The biochemical machinery underlying a circadian oscillator can be reconstituted in vitro with just three cyanobacterial proteins, KaiA, KaiB, and KaiC. These proteins interact to promote conformational changes and phosphorylation events that determine the phase of the in vitro oscillation. The high-resolution structures of these proteins suggest a ratcheting mechanism by which the KaiABC oscillator ticks unidirectionally. ”
The so-called just a mere analogy is more like a reality. Strong evidence for God being the Creator of such complex machinery from an organism that has no functions like eyes or ears to keep track of time but an unthinking process known famously for being “evolution” could not build specialized machinery randomly in living things, only a thinking process can. Now back to this blog in particular…
Some but not all intelligent design proponents claim creationists deny all of evolution. Not quite, depending upon how you define evolution, creationists like myself do in fact believe in “Micro-evolution” which is nothing more than small changes in animals through inter-breeding either at the same level or below. But what is called; “Macro-evolution” which claims a process of animals evolving into a totally different animal, is rejected by true creationists. Speaking of animals, here is a video which shows nature defying evolutionary thinking…
Originally the idea of this blog started from a webpage, that I wrote some years ago, but have updated it with new information.“The Hypothesis of Evolution and Creation Science”.
Comments are welcomed on the blog but sadly, these comments have to be moderated (babysitting). The reason being, there are some people on the internet who are very disrespectful. Ad hominem attacks are encouraged in some blogs for those who they disagree with and these same attacks are used quite frequently with those who comment. But these type of attacks are not welcomed here. What is known as the straw-man attack is another tactic used. For example, “Creationists do not believe that animals change. But clearly, animals do change. So, creationists are mistaken.” This is not true, variants within the species has been well accepted in creationism as a scientific fact which agrees with the Bible. It’s the stuff we don’t see happening which is one species changing into another species.
Keep in mind, the filter has limitations as it doesn’t always work right. Currently, once your approved it should automatically post your future comments unless you have a whole much of links. If the filter doesn’t work correctly, I tried to approve them as soon as possible.
Also, a link in one’s screen name that points back to a blog or site is not a problem neither some links with commentary, but just writing in numerous links back to their site isn’t considered a response for here either.
“Now in the public domain because of the Internet and that evolutionary science no longer belongs exclusively to the scientific establishment.”
Welcome to the information Age! I hope you enjoy the blog, Lord willing.
